Hi chrener, alessandrosx, Thanks for your comments! Only found them now, after the holidays. I tried as well without radio unit: same result: proxi alignment does not finish correctly (timeout error on the radio/nav). Additionally i tried using someone elses newer multiecuscan version: same timeout ...

Still have not found a solution for removal of the factory Navi. Maybe below log file helps to generate ideas? It shows a timeout error, is that correct behavior after removing the radio/nav? Reading CAN configuration data ... CAN CONFIGURATION DATA: 07 00 04 CF 07 00 04 CF 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 0...

Thanks for the info! I have no experience with that in depth tweaking of the info stored in the body computer. Still strange that everything works out fine with the two (older) Deltas without special steps other that proxialignment once the stock navunit is removed. These were 2008 and 2010 cars. Th...

Nobody an idea or hint what could have gone wrong?

Maybe I should have posted this better in Usage Q&A?

Hi All, Question if anyone experienced this, related to Lancia Delta, but I know Alfa Giulietta and Fiat Brava have similar systems: I Have a 2014 Lancia Delta with factory radio/navigation unit and Blue&me. I'm trying to replace it with an aftermarket Kenwood with android auto. In all cases bel...

Anybody a thought on what the Dashboard node is, and where it is located??

The new cd player unit was installed, now at least it was recognized and connected by the proxi alignment procedure, but still with a failure message on the dashboard node.

Anybody a thought on this?

The plan for today is to install another unit, and do the proxi alignment procedure again.

Thanks!!

I don't know if it is with the engine. Nobody until now has confirmed it indeed is an rpm sensor error.
But anyway I will check the sensor when I have some time.

Hi All, I just ran the proxi alignment procedure on a Lancia Thesis 2.4 20v because the cd player was exanged. Afterwards we got an EOL error indicated on the dashboard. I´ve got the following report Reading CAN configuration data ... CAN CONFIGURATION DATA: 00 02 F7 5B 00 02 F7 5B 00 00 44 40 00 00...

No real problems, however it does run a bit rough (idle quite low, 750rpm, a bit unstable). At speed, accelerating or any other road conditions nothing is wrong.

I'm just curious, and would like to know if something is not optimal